Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Mrs. Clinton?



William Shakespeare once wrote, “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” Such is not the case for presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton. Throughout the extensive coverage of the presidential preliminaries, Hillary Clinton is referred to as “Mrs. Clinton.” Hold up. A prospective presidential candidate, not to mention first viable female candidate in history, is a Mrs.? In this, our post-women’s liberated world?
Throughout their lives, men are referred to as “Sir” and “Mr.” regardless of their age or martial status. Women, however, do not have the same simplistic luxury. Young girls are referred to as “Miss” and sometime between college and menopause, we graduate to “Madam.” However, there is an unappealing age stigma attached to “Madam.” For example, my fifty-year-old mother detests being called “Madam” by grocery cashiers, retailers, and the like. But can you really call a middle-aged professional woman “Miss” either?
During the after effects the 1970’s Women’s Lib movement, the prefix “Ms.” was born into the national dialogue. “Ms.” allows a woman of any age to remain ambiguous regarding martial status. For example, Ms. Melissa Robinson could either be single, or Mr. Robinson’s wife. Thus, women gained equal ground with men if only nominally.
Enter Hillary Clinton. This woman is perhaps the most prominent women in American politics to date. In the current presidential polls, she leaves misters Barack Obama and John Edwards in the Iowa caucus dust. The fact that Hillary is a “Mrs.” shouldn’t matter, right?
Clinton began her married life as Hillary Rodham. However, things changed for Ms. Rodham when husband Bill Clinton ran for office in Arkansas. When political advisors persuaded the new First Lady of Arkansas to take her husband’s surname, Rodham conceded and was addressed as Mrs. Bill Clinton. Wouldn’t want to offend the housewives of Arkansas with such progressive nonsense like keeping your name.
In her efforts to court the traditional housewives of middle-America, Clinton seeks camaraderie (read: votes) with the women she may have alienated during her quest for power in Washington and what these particular women feel is a departure of the traditional role of the First Lady (read: nothing). The title “Mrs.” is safe for Americans because we don’t want our women to be too independent or too successful. Simply, we want them to stand by their man, a lesson Hillary knows too well.
Hillary will continue to encounter criticism based solely on her gender. However, she is a Senator, a mother, wife, and now presidential candidate. A woman of that stature deserves to be addressed as Ms. because she embodies all opportunities and choices available to women today. Perhaps one day we’ll be calling her Madame President.

by elsa quaint

6 comments:

emily said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
emily said...

The name-as-a-way of identification factor is a joke, just like the political circus and our "democracy" in general. (Everything from Hillary's haircut to the questions asked of her from the "audience" at her public appearances is completely contrived, just like it is for any candidate. Our "leaders" are no more authentic human beings than Brangelina.)
It's no secret that as Americans, we are STILL completely entrenched in patriarchal norms. Hence the inability to recognize a woman and wife as a person with her own name, identity and ability.
BUT, I guess it's still pretty awesome that Hillary's even in the mix at all, although she is clearly not a revolutionary by any means- to get to where she is, she's had to embody masculine values, etc. I guess it's a start, but given the choice, it would be much more useful toward the end of change to have a truly progressive (i.e. radical) man in office. (or out of office, since the system is broken, useless and in need of a complete overhaul.)

dundaysinner said...

so true. why even bother giving a title to that woman who hangs around the Casa Blanca? what has Mrs. GW Bush done for the free world....hard to say. the last i heard she was teaching iraqi women the ins and outs of self breast exams. (noble but an altogether underwhelming responsibility for a woman with such proximity to power). Has the term "first lady" just recently become synonymous with "blends into background" or has it always been so? In my personal opinion women have no one to blame but we, while sexism exists it's our own fear of being labeled that keeps women from taking and making their role in society. who cares if your "miss" is replaced with "bitch"...man up, or rather, woman up and grow yourself a pair (of ovaries). No one is going to break the social molds for us.

emily said...

yeah. that would entail constructing a completely new paradigm. Which sounds great but might take a bit of work. Whoever does not play the rules (i.e. those laid out for us by a male-concieved and -domintated culture) doesn't get to play at all. The patriarchally -designated "bitch" doesn't have an effective place in society outside of that role.
But I do agree that we should get it started and break these social molds. We just need a lot of women and some guys on our side too.

dundaysinner said...

i completely agree with women having to empower women.
i know "what's in a name?" but doesn't the whole "Mrs." thing just reinforce our patriarchal society? ..women as their husband's property. on the other hand, i suppose we now have a choice. and given the choice, many women do want to attach to a man, in name and in actuality. but then it starts all over againdu.

-ms els

dundaysinner said...

It's pretty sick but i think people see Ms. Hillary as a strong woman meaning she, like em said, has embodied masculine values.
it shouldn't even have to be considered being a "strong woman" to make one's way in the world and be in a position of power. Was Bill a strong man? Have any of the presidents been necessarily "strong"? (okay, maybe. but that has not been their defining factor.) Women are seen as inherently weak, lacking a pair (of testicles) so anything outside of this weak role, (knowing/seeking/doing what you want,) is seen as a non-conventional woman and exceptional (to some).
I say make it the norm!!!!
mrr